|
0258 A firefighter injured by a dangerous condition of defendant's premises while making a surprise safety inspection was not barred from recovery by the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk or the firefighter's rule, but his voluntary encounter with the dangerous condition might have been a secondary assumption of the risk for the jury to consider as part of its comparative fault analysis in apportioning liability.
DONOHUE v SFHA (Fire Inspection) 16 CA4 658 [See: Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296; Ford v Gouin 3 C4 339]
|
|
|