|
0770 Statements made by members of the public to administrative bodies pursuant to statutes inviting or authorizing comment by the public are absolutely privileged and cannot result in liability regardless of the motives of persons making such statements and regardless of whether the statements were actuated by malice; CA's anti-SLAPP statute does not violate constitutional protections of due process.
DIXON v SUPERIOR COURT (Puvunga SLAPP) 30 CA4 733 [See: Strategic Lawsuits... 27 C Western LR 399; CCP 425.16; Hung v Wang 8 CA4 908, T/AT 10/92; Wilcox v SuperCt 27 CA4 809, Matossian v Fahmie 101 CA3 128]
|
|
|