|
1096 In general, except when the employee is an on-duty police officer and the victim a member of the general public, an employer is not vicariously liable for an employee's acts of sexual misconduct, even when the employee's tort is committed at the place of employment and while the employee is attending to employment duties. (Dissenting and Concurring Opinions)
FARMERS INSURANCE v COUNTY (Jail Guards) 11 C4 992 [See: GovC 825-825.6, 995-996.6; Perez v Van Groningen 41 C3 962; Mary M v City 54 C3 202; Alma W v Oakland USD 123 CA3 133]
|
|
|