|
1924 REVIEW DENIED Off duty police officers working as security guards, who were not in uniform and had not received their primary employer's approval for the private security job, were not acting within the scope of their employment as peace officers, and their primary employer had no obligation to supervise them and was not vicariously liable for their conduct.
MELENDEZ v CITY OF LA (Off Duty Cops) 63 CA4 1 [See: 42 USC 1983; PenC 70; Inouye v County 30 CA4 278, T/AT 12/94; People v Derby 177 CA2 626; People v Corey 21 C3 738; Cervantez v JC Penney 24 C3 579]
|
|
|