|
2131 In the face of undisputed evidence that defendant had adequate notice of the action and was properly served with the summons, complaint and statement of damages, but simply failed to respond until long after a sizable judgment was entered against it, and without evidence of extrinsic fraud or mistake, a trial court abused its discretion in setting aside the default judgment previously rendered.
GIBBLE v CAR-LENE (Default Judgment) 67 CA4 295 [See: CCP 473; Dill v Berquist 24 CA4 1426, T/AT 6/94; Rappleyea v Campbell 8 C4 975]
|
|
|