|
3190 REVIEW GRANTED An arbitration clause in an employment agreement continued to apply after the employee was promoted to another position within the firm; an employment agreement was not procedurally unconscionable merely because it was presented to a prospective employee on a take-it-or-leave-it basis; an arbitration agreement between employer and employee was not substantively unconscionable because it compelled an employee to arbitrate all claims, while permitting the employer to seek injunctive or other equitable relief judicially against unfair competition or disclosure of confidential information; summary judgment may be granted against a party to litigation who has instituted arbitration but has not exhausted required arbitration remedies.
SWIDERSKI v MILBERG, WEISS... (Promoted Law Clerk) 94 CA4 719 [See: Armendariz v Foundation Health 24 C4 83, T/AT 9/00; Parsons v Bristol 62 C2 861; Rounds v Teamsters 4 C3 888]
|
|
|