|
3522 If an action arises from the exercise of a constitutional right protected by the anti-SLAPP statute, the party opposing a motion made under the statute has the burden of showing by admissible evidence that it can make out a prima facie case; to make out a prima facie case of tortious interference with contract or of tortious interference with prospective business advantage, plaintiff must show that defendant's conduct actually disrupted plaintiff's contract or advantageous business relationship and thereby resulted in damage.
TUCHSCHER v SD UNIFIED PORT DIST (City SLAPP) 106 CA4 1219 [See: CCP 425.16; Equilon v Consumer Cause 29 C4 53, T/AT 10/02; City of Cotati v Cashman 29 C4 69, T/AT 10/02; Navellier v Sletten 29 C4 82, T/AT 10/02]
|
|
|