|
3770 Defendant's email to a third person saying that material at plaintiff's website plaintiff had plagiarized from another website and listing directions to both websites was an expression of opinion, because it indicated that defendant was stating his interpretation of the facts presented and invited the reader to form its own conclusion about those facts.
FRANKLIN v DYNAMIC DETAILS (Email Opinions) 116 CA4 375 [See: CivC 47; B&PC 17200 etseq; REST 2d Torts 566; Baker v LA Herald 42 C3 254; Milkovich v Lorain 497 US 1]
|
|