|
p0539 REVIEW DENIED In a dispute under a contract calling for a royalty based on "gross receipts," the statements of industry experts should have been considered in determining whether the phrase was ambiguous, and if it was found to be so, the parties' meaning is a triable issue of fact.
WOLF v SUPERIOR COURT (Roger Rabbit) 114 Cal.App.4th 1343 [See: CivC 16351656; CCP 18591861, 1864; Bank of the West v Superior Court 2 C4 1254, T/AT 9/92; PG&E v Thomas 69 C2 33; Winet v Price 4 Cal.App.4th 1159; Ermolieff v RKO 19 C2 543]
|
|