|
p0567 An amendment to the SLAPP statute excluding from its protection statements made to actual or potential customers by sellers of goods and services about what they sell is procedural, so applying it to causes of action that arose before it went into effect is not a retroactive application and proper.
BRENTON v METABOLIFE (Retroactivity) 116 CA4 679 [See: CCP 425.16, 425.17; DuPont v Superior Court 78 CA4 562, T/AT 3/00; Nagel v Twin Labs 109 CA4 39, T/AT 6/03; Krupnick v Duke 115 CA4 1026, T/AT 3/04; http://www.advancetapes.com/citations/citationindex.html ]
|
|