|
p0705 REVIEW DENIED Remand of an action in which a judgment for defendant was reversed on appeal and sent back for determination of the sole issue of damages does not call for reexamination of any factual or legal issue in controversy in the prior proceeding and therefore does not result in a new trial, so parties are not entitled to file a peremptory challenge to the trial judge on the ground that the judgment of that judge had been reversed.
PATERNO v SUPERIOR COURT (Peremptory Challenge) 123 CA4 548 [See: CCP 170.6; Paterno v State 113 CA4 998, T/AT 1/04; Paterno v State 74 CA4 68, T/AT 9/99; Stubblefield v Superior Court 81 CA4 762, T/AT 7/00; Pfeiffer Venice v Superior Court 107 CA4 761, T/AT 9/02; Peracchi v Superior Court 30 C4 1245]
|
|