|
P0865 A trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding private attorney general fees to a plaintiff who challenged a city's approval of a construction project on the ground that it was approved without public hearings, even though the plaintiff succeeded on only one of its six causes of action, the city subsequently held the requisite hearing and reapproved the project, and if successful the plaintiffs stood to receive some personal gain by avoiding having the project next to their property.
BOWMAN v CITY OF BERKELEY (Private AG) 131 CA4 173 [See: CCP 1021.5; Graham v Daimler Chrysler 34 C4 553, P/AT 1/05]
|
|