|
4410 A police department supervisor's conversation with a police officer was found not to be intended to be an interrogation or to take place in connection with an existing or projected disciplinary proceeding, so the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act does not apply to it or to the supervisor's subsequent discovery that some of the officer's statements during the conversation were dishonest and the Act does not prevent the imposition of discipline for making those dishonest statements.
STEINERT v CITY OF COVINA (Conversation) 146 CA4 458 [See: GovC 3300 etseq; City of LA v Superior Court 57 CA4 1506]
|
|