|
P1112 A Florida seller of automobiles who has no property in California, deals primarily with Florida residents, never intentionally targeted any California resident as a potential customer, in 32 years of doing business sold only 10 of 44,800 vehicles to buyers in California, and maintained a passive website that did no more than advertise his services, did not thereby engage in conduct that purposefully availed himself of benefits of California law, so California courts did not have in personam jurisdiction over him.
SHISLER v SANFER (Florida Seller) 146 CA4 1254 [See: Pavlovich v Superior Court 29 C4 262, P/AT 1/03]
|
|