|
4607 Under the federal Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act a general release did not bar a claim that plaintiff was terminated for his participation in the armed forces of the U.S.; the Act did not prevent application of companion claims for defamation based on negative job evaluations or for overtime wages; the fact that plaintiff would have received nothing if he refused to sign the general release does not support his assertion that it was obtained under conditions of economic duress.
PEREZ v ULINE (Reserve Officer) 157 CA4 953 [See: 38 USC 4301 etseq; CivC 1542; Skrbina v Fleming 45 CA4 1353, T/AT 7/96]
|
|