4712 A city can be liable for a dangerous condition of an intersection under its control, even if the danger results from foreseeable use of adjacent property; in the absence of proof of a substantial change in circumstances, evidence that the design for an improvement to property of a public entity was approved by an official body, and that the design was not only reasonable but excellent, establishes that the approval was reasonable and makes the public entity immune from liability for a dangerous condition resulting from the design.

LAABS v CITY OF VICTORVILLE (Dangerous Intersection) 163 CA4 1242 [See: GovC 830, 835, 830.6; CCP 1038, 2033.420; GEICO v Superior Court 79 CA4 95, T/AT 4/00; Bonanno v Central Contra Costa TA 30 C4 139, T/AT 5/03; Cornette v DOT 26 C4 63, T/AT 8/01]