	NON-DELEGABLE DUTY A defendant who is found to have a non-delegable duty is vicariously liable for negligence committed by a person the defendant delegated to perform it. The following is a list of some recent cases discussing this principle. MALONEY v RATH 69 C2 442 FREMONT v HARTNETT 19 CA4 669 GAMBOA v CONTI 19 CA4 663 SRITHONG v TOTAL 23 CA4 721 FELMLEE v FALCON 36 CA4 1032 SUMMERS v A.L. GILBERT 69 CA4 1155 PARK v BURLINGTON 108 CA4 595 SERNA v PETTEY LEACH TRUCKING 110 CA4 1475 MOROHOSHI v PACIFIC HOME 39 C4 882 SHEELER v GREYSTONE 113 CA4 908 WASTE MANAGEMENT v SUPERIOR COURT 119 CA4 105 HILL BROTHERS v SUPERIOR COURT 123 CA4 1001 MOROHOSHI v PACIFIC HOME 2004 CalLEX 10639 MOROHOSHI v PACIFIC HOME 34 C4 482 BARCLAY v LANGE 129 CA4 281 CHEE v GOLDT 143 CA4 1360 4358 FIELDS v YUSUF 144 CA4 1381 EVARD v SO CAL EDISON 153 CA4 137


	Welcome Page \| Index and Search \| Case Summaries \| Index of Citation Lists Repairing Our Broken English \| Curriculum Vitae \| Sample Complimentary Tape \| Membership \| MCLE
	ADVANCE TAPES P.O. Box 237 The Sea Ranch, CA 95497 Phone: 1-800-564-2382 Fax: (707) 785-3009 Email info@advance-tapes.com
	This web site constructed and maintained by Cristalen Copyright by Steven Finz ©1992 - 2008 All rights reserved